Tag Archives: Unconstitutional

Fifth Amendment

Posted on by
Fifth Amendment

People v. Keys, No. 130110, 4th Dist.
This case presents question as to whether police violated defendant’s Fifth Amendment right to remain silent when during interrogation police continued to ask defendant questions after he stated there “ain’t nothing further for us to talk about.” Appellate Court found no violation, where defendant’s statement was not “clear and unequivocal” invocation of his right to silence, because police could have construed statement as only acknowledgment that police had sufficient evidence and required nothing further from him. Defendant also submits that his multiple convictions on charge of concealment of homicidal death and dismembering of body are improper since his actions pertained to same homicidal death and he dismembered same human body; and (2) trial court improperly admitted videotape of defendant’s police interrogation, where said videotape included police statements of their belief in defendant’s guilt and statements that defendant had confessed to crime to others. Appellate Court, though, found that multiple convictions on concealment/dismembering offenses were proper as each conviction was based on discrete act, and admission of videotape was proper, because it was “useful” in showing that defendant was unaffected by police tactics during interrogation, and that there were flaws in defendant’s denials.

Voluntary and Involuntary Dismissals

Posted on by

The Rationale Behind Voluntary Dismissals

Voluntary dismissals without prejudice happen when the prosecutor or plaintiff solicits the court to remove the case, with the intention to bring it back later. Several situations might warrant this:

  • Discovery of new details that require alterations to the charges or lawsuit.
  • The need to introduce additional defendants.
  • The prosecutor’s desire to modify the case, making the charges either stricter or more lenient.
  • Or simply the wish to place the case in an alternate court setting, such as a federal or small claims court.

Consider this scenario: Imagine Betty, a tourist in California, facing grave injuries from a vehicular mishap. Her legal representative lodges a claim in a Californian court. Yet, as the gravity of her injuries escalate, the legal damages exceed $75,000, making her case eligible for federal jurisdiction. Preferring a non-local jury, Betty’s attorney seeks a voluntary “without prejudice” dismissal to move the case to a federal district court.

When Dismissal Isn’t by Choice: Involuntary Dismissals

The term “involuntary dismissal” pertains to scenarios where a judge takes the initiative to remove a case without the plaintiff or prosecutor’s request. Various reasons can trigger this:

  • Insufficiencies in the plaintiff’s grievance.
  • Legal inconsistencies within the charges or complaint.
  • Issues with the court’s jurisdiction concerning the case or defendant.
  • Absence of proper notification to the defendant regarding the lawsuit.
  • Or the judge’s belief that the venue is inappropriate.

If it’s an involuntary dismissal without prejudice, the plaintiff or prosecutor has the liberty to rectify the discrepancies leading to the dismissal and to refile. But time is of the essence, especially if the statute of limitations is on the verge of expiration.

The Clock Keeps Ticking: Statute of Limitations

The clock doesn’t pause with a “without prejudice” dismissal. The statute of limitations remains unaffected. If your lawsuit faces such a dismissal and the statute of limitations lapses before refiling, the case will encounter another dismissal, but this time, “with prejudice,” rendering it inadmissible due to being time-barred by the statute of limitations.

For instance, suppose Raphael faces assault charges. Legal irregularities in the documentation lead the judge to discard the case “without prejudice,” allowing prosecutors a chance to rectify and refile. However, they falter with timing. By the time it’s presented again, the one-year legal timeframe for assault allegations has passed, prompting Raphael’s defense to request a dismissal on account of time constraints.

Contrast with “With Prejudice” Dismissals

A “with prejudice” dismissal is a firm conclusion. No room exists for the same or analogous charges to be refiled. Yet, alternate charges remain an option for the prosecutors. For plaintiffs, a “with prejudice” conclusion signifies a lost cause.

Several scenarios can lead to a “with prejudice” dismissal, including:

  • Successfully completing a rehabilitation program.
  • The inherent weakness of the case’s evidence.
  • Expiry of the statute of limitations.
  • Or recurrent “without prejudice” dismissals leading the judge to deny further chances.

What is an indictment in the legal world?

Posted on by

An indictment in the legal world refers to a formal written accusation or charge against an individual or entity that alleges that they have committed a criminal offense. It is typically issued by a grand jury or a prosecutor in a criminal case after they have gathered sufficient evidence to believe that a crime has been committed and that the person or entity named in the indictment is responsible for it.

An indictment outlines the specific charges, details of the alleged offense, and other relevant information. It serves as the foundation for the subsequent legal proceedings in a criminal case, providing notice to the accused of the charges they are facing and the basis for those charges.

Indictments are a critical part of the criminal justice system in many jurisdictions and are designed to ensure that individuals are informed of the allegations against them and have an opportunity to defend themselves in court. The issuance of an indictment does not indicate guilt; it’s a formal step in the legal process that initiates criminal proceedings and leads to a trial, plea negotiation, or other resolution of the case.

The historical origins of the 5th Amendment.

Posted on by

The historical origins of the 5th Amendment can be traced back to English common law and the struggles for individual rights and liberties. The amendment is part of the United States Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution to protect the rights of American citizens.

The 5th Amendment was ratified in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, which comprises the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Its origins can be traced to several key historical events and principles:

  1. English Common Law: The concept of the 5th Amendment has its roots in English common law, where certain rights were recognized as fundamental protections against the arbitrary exercise of government power. These principles were brought to the American colonies by English settlers.
  2. Magna Carta (1215): One of the earliest sources of protection against government abuse can be found in the Magna Carta, a foundational legal document in English history. Issued by King John of England in 1215, the Magna Carta established the principle that no person should be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
  3. Colonial Experience: The American colonists experienced various grievances under British rule, including violations of their rights to trial by jury and protection against self-incrimination. These experiences further fueled the desire to enshrine protections in the form of amendments to the newly drafted Constitution.
  4. Influence of State Constitutions: Several state constitutions, adopted prior to the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, already included provisions similar to those found in the 5th Amendment. These state-level protections were influential in shaping the Bill of Rights.
  5. Constitutional Convention: During the Constitutional Convention of 1787, there was a heated debate over the inclusion of a Bill of Rights. Some framers, like James Madison, initially opposed it, arguing that the Constitution itself provided sufficient protection for individual rights. However, others, including anti-Federalists, insisted on the inclusion of explicit protections. The eventual compromise led to the addition of the Bill of Rights, which included the 5th Amendment.

The 5th Amendment guarantees several important rights, including protection against double jeopardy, the right to remain silent and avoid self-incrimination, and the right to due process of law. It plays a vital role in safeguarding individual liberties and ensuring that the government cannot deprive citizens of their life, liberty, or property without following established legal procedures.

What are the responsibilities of a criminal defense lawyer?

Posted on by

A criminal defense lawyer is a legal professional who specializes in defending individuals or organizations accused of criminal offenses. Their primary responsibility is to protect the rights of their clients and ensure they receive a fair trial. Here are some of the key responsibilities of a criminal defense lawyer:

  1. Legal Counsel: Criminal defense lawyers provide legal advice and guidance to their clients throughout the entire legal process. They explain the charges against their clients, assess the strength of the prosecution’s case, and discuss the potential consequences and options available.
  2. Case Analysis: Lawyers carefully review all the evidence, witness statements, and legal documentation related to the case. They analyze the facts to identify any legal loopholes, inconsistencies, or potential defenses that can be used to protect their client’s interests.
  3. Investigation: Criminal defense attorneys conduct independent investigations to gather additional evidence or information that can support their client’s defense. They may hire investigators, interview witnesses, review surveillance footage, or consult with experts to build a strong case.
  4. Legal Strategy: Based on their analysis and investigation, defense lawyers develop a legal strategy tailored to their client’s specific circumstances. They determine the most appropriate defense approach, such as challenging the evidence, questioning witnesses’ credibility, or negotiating for a favorable plea deal.
  5. Court Representation: Defense lawyers represent their clients in court proceedings. They present arguments, cross-examine witnesses, object to improper evidence, and make motions to protect their client’s rights. They also prepare and deliver opening statements, closing arguments, and handle all necessary legal procedures during trial.
  6. Negotiation: Criminal defense attorneys engage in negotiations with prosecutors to seek a favorable outcome for their clients. This may involve plea bargaining, where they work to reduce charges or penalties in exchange for a guilty plea. They strive to secure the best possible outcome, whether it’s a dismissal, reduced charges, or minimized penalties.
  7. Legal Advocacy: Defense lawyers advocate for their clients’ rights at all stages of the legal process. They ensure that their clients’ constitutional rights, such as the right to a fair trial, due process, and protection against self-incrimination, are upheld. They may challenge the admissibility of evidence obtained unlawfully or argue for the suppression of certain statements.
  8. Expertise and Research: Criminal defense lawyers stay up-to-date with changes in criminal law, precedents, and legal strategies. They conduct legal research to support their arguments, stay informed about relevant case law, and apply their expertise to develop strong defenses.
  9. Client Support: Defense attorneys provide emotional support and reassurance to their clients throughout the legal proceedings. They maintain open lines of communication, address concerns, and ensure their clients are well-informed about the progress of their case.
  10. Post-Trial Actions: In the event of a conviction, criminal defense lawyers may assist their clients with post-trial actions such as filing appeals, seeking sentence reductions, or exploring other legal remedies to challenge the verdict or reduce the penalties imposed.

It’s important to note that the specific responsibilities of a criminal defense lawyer can vary depending on the jurisdiction, the nature of the case, and the individual circumstances.

Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution

Posted on by

Under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, individuals are granted several important rights that protect them in criminal proceedings. The Fifth Amendment states:

“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Here are the key rights provided by the Fifth Amendment:

  1. Protection against Self-Incrimination: The Fifth Amendment guarantees that no person “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” This means that an individual cannot be forced to testify or provide self-incriminating evidence that may be used against them in a criminal trial.
  2. Protection against Double Jeopardy: The “Double Jeopardy” clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits the government from prosecuting an individual twice for the same offense. Once a person has been acquitted or convicted of a particular crime, they cannot be tried again for that same crime.
  3. Right to Due Process: The Fifth Amendment safeguards an individual’s right to due process of law. This means that the government must follow fair and established legal procedures before depriving a person of their life, liberty, or property. It ensures that individuals receive fair treatment, notice of the charges against them, and an opportunity to be heard in court.
  4. Grand Jury Indictment: In cases involving serious crimes, the Fifth Amendment requires that a person can only be prosecuted for a capital or infamous crime after being indicted by a grand jury. However, this requirement does not apply to cases arising in the military or militia during times of war or public danger.
  5. Protection of Private Property: The “Takings Clause” of the Fifth Amendment ensures that the government cannot take private property for public use without providing just compensation to the owner. This protection is often associated with the concept of eminent domain, which allows the government to take private property for public use, but only if fair compensation is provided.

These rights granted by the Fifth Amendment are essential for safeguarding individuals’ liberties and ensuring fairness and justice in the criminal justice system.

The law of personal injury

Posted on by

The law of personal injury, also known as tort law, is a legal framework that governs cases where a person has suffered harm or injury due to the actions or negligence of another party. Personal injury law allows individuals who have been injured to seek compensation for their losses and damages.

Here are some key aspects of personal injury law:

  1. Negligence: Many personal injury cases are based on the concept of negligence. To establish negligence, the injured party must show that the responsible party owed them a duty of care, breached that duty, and as a result, caused injury or harm. For example, in a car accident case, a driver may be considered negligent if they were texting while driving and caused a collision.
  2. Types of Personal Injury Cases: Personal injury cases can arise from various situations, including car accidents, slip and fall accidents, medical malpractice, product liability, workplace accidents, and intentional acts like assault or battery. Each type of case may have specific legal elements and requirements that need to be met.
  3. Damages: In personal injury cases, the injured party may be entitled to different types of damages, including economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages typically include medical expenses, lost wages, property damage, and other measurable financial losses. Non-economic damages cover intangible losses such as pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of companionship, and loss of enjoyment of life.
  4. Statute of Limitations: Personal injury cases are subject to a statute of limitations, which is the timeframe within which a lawsuit must be filed. The specific time limits vary depending on the jurisdiction and the type of case. Failing to file a lawsuit within the statute of limitations can result in the loss of the right to seek compensation.
  5. Insurance and Settlements: In many personal injury cases, insurance companies are involved. The injured party may need to communicate and negotiate with the insurance company to obtain a settlement. It’s important to understand that insurance companies may try to minimize the amount of compensation paid, so it can be helpful to have legal representation to protect your interests.
  6. Role of Personal Injury Lawyers: Personal injury lawyers specialize in representing individuals who have been injured due to the negligence of others. They provide legal advice, gather evidence, negotiate with insurance companies, and, if necessary, file lawsuits and represent their clients in court. Having a skilled personal injury lawyer can significantly increase the chances of obtaining fair compensation.

It’s worth noting that personal injury laws can vary between jurisdictions, so it’s important to consult with a legal professional or research the specific laws in your area if you have a personal injury case or need legal advice.

Hidden Penalties for Convictions in Illinois

Posted on by
In Illinois, there are several hidden penalties that can accompany a criminal conviction. Some of the most significant include:
Loss of voting rights: If you are convicted of a felony in Illinois, you will lose your right to vote until you complete your sentence and any related probation or parole.
Difficulty finding housing: Many landlords and property management companies conduct background checks on prospective tenants. If you have a criminal record, it may be more difficult to find housing, particularly if you have been convicted of a serious crime.
Difficulty finding employment: Similarly, many employers conduct background checks on job applicants. If you have a criminal record, it may be more difficult to find employment, particularly in certain industries.
Loss of professional licenses: Depending on the nature of the crime, a conviction may result in the loss of a professional license, making it difficult to continue working in certain fields.
Immigration consequences: If you are not a U.S. citizen, a criminal conviction can have serious immigration consequences, including deportation or denial of citizenship.
Loss of gun ownership rights: Depending on the nature of the crime, a conviction can result in the loss of your right to own or possess a firearm.
It is important to note that these consequences can have a significant impact on your life even after you have completed your sentence. If you are facing criminal charges in Illinois, it is important to speak with an experienced criminal defense attorney to understand the potential consequences of a conviction and to explore your legal options.

Criminal Unlawful Possession of a Controlled Substance in Illinois and defenses.

Posted on by
Criminal Unlawful Possession of a Controlled Substance in Illinois and defenses.
The unlawful possession of a controlled substance in Illinois is a serious crime that can result in significant penalties, including jail time, fines, and a criminal record. The penalties for unlawful possession of a controlled substance vary depending on the type of drug, the amount of the drug possessed, and the person’s criminal history.
What is a controlled substance?
A controlled substance is a drug that is regulated by the government. The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) is a federal law that classifies drugs into five categories, or “schedules,” based on their potential for abuse and addiction. The CSA also sets forth the penalties for possessing, manufacturing, distributing, or selling controlled substances.
What is the law in Illinois regarding the possession of a controlled substance?
The Illinois Controlled Substances Act (720 ILCS 570/) prohibits the possession of controlled substances without a valid prescription. The law defines “possession” as “actual physical possession or constructive possession.” Actual physical possession means that the person has the drug on their person or in their immediate control. Constructive possession means that the person has the drug under their dominion and control, even if it is not on their person or in their immediate control.
What are the penalties for unlawful possession of a controlled substance in Illinois?
The penalties for unlawful possession of a controlled substance in Illinois vary depending Depending on on the type of drug, the amount of the drug possessed, and the person’s criminal history. The following are the general penalties for unlawful possession of a controlled substance in Illinois:
Schedule I and II drugs: Possession of a small amount of a Schedule I or II drug is a Class 4 felony. A Class 4 felony is punishable by up to three years in prison and a fine of up to $25,000.
Schedule III, IV, and V drugs: Possession of a small amount of a Schedule III, IV, or V drug is a Class A misdemeanor. A Class A misdemeanor is punishable by up to one year in jail and a fine of up to $2,500.
Anabolic steroids: Possession of anabolic steroids is a Class C misdemeanor. A Class C misdemeanor is punishable by up to 30 days in jail and a fine of up to $1,500.
What are the defenses to a charge of unlawful possession of a controlled substance in Illinois?
There are a number of defenses that may be available to a person charged with unlawful possession of a controlled substance in Illinois. Some of the most common defenses include:
The person had a valid prescription for the drug.
The person was not aware that they were in possession of the drug.
The drug was found in a public place and the person did not have control over it.
The person was acting in self-defense when they possessed the drug.
What should I do if I am charged with unlawful possession of a controlled substance in Illinois?
If you are charged with unlawful possession of a controlled substance in Illinois, it is important to speak with an experienced criminal defense attorney as soon as possible. An attorney can help you understand the charges against you, develop a defense strategy, and represent you in court.

The law of search and seizure in Illinois

Posted on by
The law of search and seizure in Illinois is governed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 11 of the Illinois Constitution. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. This means that the police cannot search a person or their property without a warrant, unless there is an exception to the warrant requirement.
There are a few exceptions to the warrant requirement. For example, the police can search a person or their property without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe that the person is involved in a crime and that evidence of the crime will be found in the place to be searched. The police can also search a person or their property without a warrant if they are in hot pursuit of a suspect or if they have exigent circumstances, such as a belief that evidence is about to be destroyed.
If the police conduct an illegal search, the evidence obtained in the search may not be admissible in court. This means that the prosecution cannot use the evidence to prove its case against the defendant. In addition, the defendant may be able to file a civil lawsuit against the police for damages.
Here are some of the key provisions of the law of search and seizure in Illinois:
The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures.
The police cannot search a person or their property without a warrant, unless there is an exception to the warrant requirement.
There are a few exceptions to the warrant requirement, such as probable cause, hot pursuit, and exigent circumstances.
If the police conduct an illegal search, the evidence obtained in the search may not be admissible in court.
The defendant may be able to file a civil lawsuit against the police for damages.