Category Archives: Discrimination

What does it take to be a great criminal defense lawyer?

Posted on by

To be a great criminal defense lawyer, several key skills and qualities are essential:

  1. Thorough preparation and attention to detail. Great criminal defense attorneys meticulously examine every aspect of a case, including warrants, indictments, search warrants, and relevant case law. They leave no stone unturned in building a strong defense.
  2. Extensive knowledge of criminal law and procedure. Top defense lawyers are subject matter experts in their state’s criminal code, criminal procedure, and rules of evidence. This deep understanding allows them to identify legal flaws and build effective defense strategies.
  3. Strong storytelling and communication skills. The ability to convey facts in a compelling manner to judges and juries is crucial. Great defense attorneys can present their client’s story persuasively and passionately.
  4. Strategic use of objections and evidence rules. Knowing when and how to object effectively is important, as is understanding how to use the rules of evidence to the client’s advantage.
  5. Negotiation skills. Many cases are resolved through plea bargaining, so being able to negotiate favorable deals with prosecutors is vital.
  6. Willingness to go to trial. The best defense attorneys are prepared and willing to take cases to trial when necessary, which can lead to better outcomes for clients.
  7. Building relationships and rapport. Being friendly and likable with everyone in the courtroom, from judges to prosecutors, can work wonders for a defense attorney.
  8. Emotional intelligence and client management. Criminal cases are often highly stressful for defendants, so great defense lawyers need compassion and the ability to manage their clients’ emotions effectively.
  9. Adaptability and quick thinking. Court proceedings can be unpredictable, requiring attorneys to think on their feet and adjust strategies as needed.
  10. Ethical conduct and integrity. Maintaining high ethical standards is crucial for building credibility with the court and earning clients’ trust.

While confidence and courtroom presence are important, truly great criminal defense attorneys combine these qualities with extensive legal knowledge, meticulous preparation, and strategic thinking to provide the best possible defense for their clients.

4th amendment in Illinois law

Posted on by

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, plays a crucial role in Illinois law enforcement and criminal proceedings. Illinois courts interpret and apply Fourth Amendment principles in accordance with both federal and state precedents.In Illinois, the Fourth Amendment’s protections extend to various situations, including traffic stops, home searches, and personal searches. The key principle underlying these protections is the concept of reasonableness – law enforcement actions must be reasonable under the circumstances to be considered constitutional.When challenging a potential Fourth Amendment violation in Illinois, defendants typically file a motion to suppress evidence. This motion must clearly identify the evidence sought to be suppressed and state facts showing why the search or seizure was unlawful. It’s important to note that Illinois law does not recognize a “motion to quash arrest” – the proper procedure is always a motion to suppress evidence.Illinois courts follow the exclusionary rule, which means that evidence obtained through an unconstitutional search or seizure is generally inadmissible in court. This includes not only the directly seized evidence but also any evidence derived from the illegal search, known as “fruit of the poisonous tree”.Some key aspects of Fourth Amendment application in Illinois include:

  1. Traffic stops: Police must have reasonable suspicion of a traffic violation or criminal activity to initiate a stop.
  2. Home searches: Warrantless searches of homes are presumptively unreasonable, with certain exceptions such as consent or exigent circumstances.
  3. Terry stops: Officers may briefly detain and pat down individuals if they have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
  4. School searches: School officials need only reasonable suspicion, not probable cause, to search students under their authority.
  5. Vehicle searches: Probable cause is generally required to search a vehicle, though there are exceptions for certain circumstances.

Illinois courts also recognize that the state constitution can provide greater protection than the federal Constitution in some instances. Therefore, Illinois search and seizure law may sometimes offer broader protections than federal law.Understanding these principles is crucial for both law enforcement and citizens in Illinois to ensure that Fourth Amendment rights are respected while allowing for effective law enforcement activities.

What is an indictment in the legal world?

Posted on by

An indictment in the legal world refers to a formal written accusation or charge against an individual or entity that alleges that they have committed a criminal offense. It is typically issued by a grand jury or a prosecutor in a criminal case after they have gathered sufficient evidence to believe that a crime has been committed and that the person or entity named in the indictment is responsible for it.

An indictment outlines the specific charges, details of the alleged offense, and other relevant information. It serves as the foundation for the subsequent legal proceedings in a criminal case, providing notice to the accused of the charges they are facing and the basis for those charges.

Indictments are a critical part of the criminal justice system in many jurisdictions and are designed to ensure that individuals are informed of the allegations against them and have an opportunity to defend themselves in court. The issuance of an indictment does not indicate guilt; it’s a formal step in the legal process that initiates criminal proceedings and leads to a trial, plea negotiation, or other resolution of the case.

Lead Attorney Louis M. Pissios

Why is the Magna Carta important to the American legal system?

Posted on by
The Magna Carta, also known as the Great Charter, is a foundational document in the history of constitutional law and individual rights. It was originally issued in 1215 during the reign of King John of England in response to a political crisis between the king and his barons. While it directly applies to English law, the principles and ideas contained in the Magna Carta have had a profound and lasting impact on legal systems around the world, including the American legal system. Here’s why the Magna Carta is important to the American legal system:
Historical Influence: The Magna Carta is one of the earliest examples of a written constitution that limited the powers of a monarch and established the concept of the rule of law. It set a precedent for the idea that even the king was subject to the law and that his powers had legal limits. This idea of legal constraints on government authority deeply influenced the development of American constitutionalism.
Common Law Tradition: The Magna Carta played a crucial role in shaping the common law tradition, which forms the backbone of the American legal system. Common law is a system of law based on judicial decisions and customs rather than written statutes. Many fundamental principles of common law, such as due process, habeas corpus, and trial by jury, were first articulated or reinforced in the Magna Carta and later incorporated into American law.
Protection of Individual Rights: The Magna Carta laid the groundwork for the protection of individual rights and liberties. Some of its key provisions, like the right to a fair trial, the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, and the guarantee of property rights, have been echoed and expanded upon in the American legal system through the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments to the United States Constitution.
Limited Government: The Magna Carta’s emphasis on limiting the power of the king and ensuring accountability provided a foundation for the concept of limited government, which is a fundamental principle of the American political system. The U.S. Constitution and its separation of powers into three branches (legislative, executive, and judicial) reflect the idea of preventing any single branch from becoming too powerful, mirroring the concerns addressed in the Magna Carta.
Inspiration for Colonial Charters: As English colonists settled in North America, they brought with them their legal traditions and principles. The Magna Carta served as an essential reference point for early colonial charters and documents, further influencing the development of American legal principles and concepts.
While the Magna Carta itself does not have direct legal authority in the American legal system, its principles and ideas have significantly shaped the formation and evolution of American law and governance. Its legacy continues to be celebrated and honored as a cornerstone of the protection of individual rights and the rule of law in the United States.

What are the rights of a criminal defendant in the United States as opposed to other countries?

Posted on by

The United States has a number of constitutional rights that protect criminal defendants. These rights include the right to a speedy and public trial, the right to an attorney, the right to confront witnesses against them, the right to be free from self-incrimination, and the right to due process of law.

Other countries also have similar rights for criminal defendants, but the specific rights that are guaranteed may vary. For example, the European Convention on Human Rights guarantees the right to a fair trial, but it does not specifically guarantee the right to a public trial.

In general, the United States has a more adversarial system of justice than other countries. This means that the prosecution and the defense are more likely to be at odds with each other, and the judge’s role is to referee the dispute. In other countries, the system is more inquisitorial, where the judge is actively involved in investigating the case and trying to find the truth.

The United States also has a higher rate of incarceration than other countries. This is due in part to the fact that the United States has a wider range of crimes that are punishable by incarceration, and in part to the fact that the United States has a more punitive approach to criminal justice.

Despite these differences, the United States and other countries share a common goal of ensuring that criminal defendants are treated fairly and that their rights are protected.

A general outline of the American legal system

Posted on by
A general outline of the American legal system: The American legal system is based on the common law system, which means that it is based on precedents set by previous court cases. The system is divided into two levels: the federal court system and the state court system.
The federal court system has three main levels: district courts, circuit courts, and the Supreme Court of the United States. District courts are the trial courts of the federal system, and they have jurisdiction over a variety of cases involving federal law. Circuit courts are the appeals courts of the federal system, and they review decisions made by district courts. The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the federal system, and it has the power to decide cases that involve important issues of federal law.
The state court system is divided into two main levels: trial courts and appellate courts. Trial courts are the courts where cases are first heard, and they have jurisdiction over a variety of cases involving state law. Appellate courts review decisions made by trial courts, and they have the power to overturn decisions that they find to be incorrect.
The American legal system is a complex system, but it is designed to ensure that justice is served. The system is based on the principle of due process, which means that everyone has the right to a fair trial. The system is also based on the principle of equal protection, which means that everyone is treated equally under the law.

What do lawyers do?

Posted on by

One of the most common questions people have about law and lawyers is “What do lawyers do?”

Lawyers are legal professionals who are trained to provide legal advice, represent clients in legal proceedings, and draft legal documents such as contracts, wills, and legal briefs. Their job is to advocate for their clients’ interests and provide guidance on legal matters.

Another common question people have is “How do I find a good lawyer?”

Finding a good lawyer can be a daunting task, but some ways to find one include asking for recommendations from friends or family members who have had legal experiences, looking for online reviews and ratings of lawyers, checking with local bar associations, and scheduling consultations with potential attorneys to discuss your case and see if they are a good fit for your needs.

Other common questions people have about law and lawyers include the cost of legal services, the time it takes to resolve legal issues, the qualifications required to become a lawyer, and the different types of law that lawyers practice.

Louis M. Pissios
ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW
across the street from the courthouse
9 South County Street
Waukegan, Illinois 60085-5567
Practicing in Criminal Defense and Personal Injury
TELEPHONE (847) 263-0001

One of the most important documents in legal history.

Posted on by
One of the most important documents in history.
The Magna Carta, also known as the Great Charter, is a historic document that was signed in 1215 by King John of England. The Magna Carta is one of the most significant legal documents in history, and it has been a source of inspiration for democracy, human rights, and the rule of law around the world.
At the time of its signing, the Magna Carta was primarily a document that established limits on the powers of the King. It was written by a group of powerful barons who were frustrated with the King’s authoritarian rule and sought to protect their rights and privileges. The Magna Carta contained provisions that addressed various issues, including the rights of free men, the limits on the power of the King, and the administration of justice.
One of the most significant provisions in the Magna Carta was the right to due process. This provision ensured that no one could be deprived of their life, liberty, or property without being given a fair trial. The Magna Carta also established the principle that the law applies to everyone, including the King, and that no one is above the law.
The Magna Carta also established the principle of taxation with representation. This meant that the King could not levy taxes without the consent of the barons, which was an important step towards establishing a representative government.
While the Magna Carta was primarily a document that addressed the rights of the barons, its impact went far beyond this group. Over time, the Magna Carta became a symbol of freedom and justice, and it inspired many people to fight for their rights and freedoms.
One of the most significant examples of the influence of the Magna Carta was in the development of the United States Constitution. Many of the principles and provisions in the Magna Carta, such as the right to due process, the rule of law, and the principle of taxation with representation, were incorporated into the US Constitution.
The Magna Carta also influenced the development of human rights law around the world. It inspired the creation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was adopted by the United Nations in 1948. The principles of the Magna Carta continue to be relevant today, and they are a reminder of the importance of protecting human rights, the rule of law, and democratic values.
In conclusion, the Magna Carta is a historic document that played a significant role in the development of democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. Its provisions addressed issues that were relevant at the time of its signing, and its influence has continued to shape legal and political systems around the world. The Magna Carta serves as a reminder of the importance of protecting individual rights and freedoms and the rule of law, and its principles continue to be relevant today.

DUI Statistics and Consequences in Illinois

Posted on by

According to the Illinois Secretary of State’s Office, in 2019 there were 26,052 DUI arrests in Illinois. This number has decreased slightly from the previous year, when there were 26,649 DUI arrests.

In addition to the number of arrests, there were 309 alcohol-related fatalities in Illinois in 2019, which was an increase from the previous year, when there were 299 alcohol-related fatalities.

It’s worth noting that DUI statistics can vary from year to year, and that driving under the influence can have serious consequences, including injury or death to oneself or others, as well as legal penalties such as fines, license suspension or revocation, and even jail time. It’s important to always prioritize safety when driving and to never get behind the wheel if you’ve been drinking or using drugs.

The consequences of a DUI in Illinois can be severe, including both administrative and criminal penalties. Here are some of the potential consequences:

  1. Administrative Penalties: If you are arrested for a DUI in Illinois, the Illinois Secretary of State’s Office will automatically suspend your driver’s license, even before any criminal charges are filed. The length of the suspension will depend on a number of factors, including whether this is your first or subsequent offense, your blood alcohol content (BAC), and whether you refused to take a chemical test. A first-time DUI offense with a BAC of 0.08% or higher can result in a license suspension of up to 6 months.
  2. Criminal Penalties: If you are convicted of a DUI in Illinois, the criminal penalties can include fines, community service, and even jail time. The severity of the penalties will depend on a number of factors, including whether this is your first or subsequent offense, your BAC, and whether there were any aggravating factors, such as causing an accident that resulted in injury or death. A first-time DUI offense in Illinois is typically a Class A misdemeanor, which can result in fines of up to $2,500 and up to 364 days in jail.
  3. Ignition Interlock Device: In some cases, the court may require that you install an ignition interlock device (IID) in your vehicle. This device requires you to take a breath test before you can start your car, and it will prevent the car from starting if it detects alcohol on your breath.
  4. DUI School: In addition to the above penalties, if you are convicted of a DUI in Illinois, you will also be required to attend a DUI school. This program is designed to educate you on the dangers of drunk driving and how to avoid it in the future.

It’s important to note that the penalties for a DUI in Illinois can be more severe for repeat offenders or for those whose BAC was particularly high at the time of the arrest. In addition to legal consequences, a DUI conviction can also have serious consequences for your employment, insurance rates, and other areas of your life.

Louis M. Pissios
ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW
across the street from the courthouse
9 South County Street
Waukegan, Illinois 60085-5567
Practicing in Criminal Defense and Personal Injury
TELEPHONE (847) 263-0001

 

Illinois Supreme Court released 4 criminal law cases for March 2016.

Posted on by

 

Here are the top 13 criminal law cases from the Illinois court system for March 2016. The first 4 are from the Illinois Supreme Court. Number 4 was a victory for the defense at the lower level and the Illinois Supreme Court had something to say about that.

  1.  People v. Burns
    The “no-nights visits” rule is affirmed, can’t bring the sniffer dog to your front step for a little sniff action.
  2. People v. Bradford
    Prosecution no longer allowed to overcharge an ordinary retail theft to a burglary.
  3. People v. Clark
    Aggravated vehicular hijacking and armed robbery without a firearm are not lesser-included offenses of aggravated vehicular hijacking and armed robbery with a firearm.
  4. People v. Timmsen
    Apparently, the police can stop you for trying to legally avoid a roadblock.
  5. People v. Abram
    Officers approach defendant who was sitting in his car he then, to say the least, ensues in outright flight.
  6. People v. Smith
    This trial judge was overruled; there is nothing unconstitutional about requesting citizen’s to roll up their sleeves.
  7. People v. Thompson
    Some of the State’s remarks relied on questionable advocacy, but did not rise to the level of clear and obvious error.
  8. People v. Meuris
    In a leaving the scene of an accident prosecution the State must not only prove that Defendant knew he was involved in an accident but also that another person was involved.
  9. People v. Weinke
    Reviewing court says ASA exaggerated the severity of victim’s condition and misled the court as to the source and timing of her information in order to pressure the court into granting a quickie deposition.
  10. People v. Tayborn
    Trial counsel was ineffective for not challenging defendant’s confession given without Miranda warnings.
  11. People v. Little
    Cigarette break is not a sufficient amount of time to remove the taint of the original Miranda violation.
  12. People v. Gray
    These drug officers were themselves charged with distributing narcotics and Defendant was not told about the investigation before he plead guilty to his own drug charges.
  13. People v. Fulton
    In a charge of armed habitual criminal the same conviction can be used as one of the predicate offenses as well the predicate to the UUW Felony conviction that may be being used.